What is the Path of Rudolf Steiner?

28 minute video

If above video does not work watch below video.


What is Rudolf Steiner’s Path to Freedom?

Path of Science
Path of Cosmic Logic
Path of Anthroposophy
Path of Freedom
Path of Pure Thinking
Path of Study
Path of Ethical Individualism
Path of Clairvoyance
Path of Philosophy
Path of Anthroposophical Community
Path of Individual Initiative
Path of New Social Order

"Each one of us has it in themselves to be a free spirit, just as every rose bud has in it a rose."

“My purpose was to write a biographical account of how one human soul made the difficult ascent to freedom.”

“I found my own way as best I could, and then, later on, described the route that I had taken.”

In a letter to Rosa Mayreder, “If you had rejected my book, it would have been incomparably painful for me… I don’t teach. I relate what I have inwardly experienced. I relate it as I have experienced it.”

How to get the book:
The Philosophy of Freedom (unrevised) -- R. F. Alfred Hoernle

Once asked, for which of his books he would be remembered as writer, Rudolf Steiner answered, “For my Philosophy of Freedom.”

Path of Science
The Philosophy of Freedom is the result of introspective observation following the methods of natural science.

“I was not setting forth a doctrine, but simply recording inner experiences through which I had actually passed. And I reported them just as I experienced them.”

“What I was really trying to do in The Philosophy of Freedom was to locate freedom empirically and thus put it on a solidly scientific basis.”

Galileo took a seminal role in launching the first revolution in the physical sciences, and a key element in this revolution was the rigorous, sophisticated observation of physical phenomena.

Darwin likewise launched a revolution in the life sciences on the basis of decades of meticulous observation of biological phenomena.

By using the Philosophy of Freedom as a map for making introspective observations of inner life an opportunity exists for a 21st century revolution in our understanding of the mind sciences.

“For one of the things most centrally needed is clarity on the path of inner striving, a clarity of inner striving comparable to the clarity of external striving. Not vague mysticism, but brightest clarity.”

In a conversation with Rudolf Steiner in 1922 Walter Johannes Stein asked,
“What will remain of your work in thousands of years?
Rudolf Steiner replied: “Nothing but the Philosophy of Freedom,” and then he added: “But everything is contained in it. If someone realizes the act of freedom described there, he finds the whole content of Anthroposophy”.

The pure thinking of science (rightly understood) is the sole avenue leading to the spirituality of the future.

Rudolf Steiner, while writing The Philosophy of Freedom was not concerned with philosophy as such, but with working out for himself the means of expression which, in its very thought-formation could bring about the transformation of those forces which had been brought to highest possible peak in pure scientific thinking and now could become the spring board for a final leap into new realms.

Path of Cosmic Logic
"In 1894 I made the attempt with my Philosophy of Freedom to provide a philosophic basis on which to approach spiritual science. It presents the wide range of human standpoints, often masquerading under such strange philosophical names, in a way that leaves the reader free of attachment to any particular approach and able to let the various concepts speak for themselves, as though each were a photograph of one and the same object taken from many different angles."

The Philosophy of Freedom is a thought organism whose structure is depicted in Steiner’s World-Outlook diagram found in his Human and Cosmic Thought lectures. Steiner states the World-Outlook diagram indicates the logic of the Spiritual Hierarchies of the cosmos. "..their logic was indicated in the diagram I drew for you."

World-Outlook Diagram

“For in the case of a book like this, the important thing is so to organize the thoughts it contains that they take effect. With many other books it doesn’t make a great deal of difference if one shifts the sequence, putting this thing first and that later. But in the case of The Philosophy of Freedom that is impossible. It would be just as unthinkable to put page 150 fifty pages earlier as it would be to put a dog’s hind legs where the front ones belong.”

“Catharsis is an ancient term for the purification of the astral body by means of meditation and concentration exercises. If a reader takes this book as it was meant and relates to it in the way a virtuoso playing a composition on the piano relates to its composer, reproducing the whole piece out of himself, the books organically evolved thought sequence will bring about a high degree of catharsis.”

“Within this book thinking is experienced in a way that makes it impossible for a person involved in it to have any other impression, when he is living in thought, he is living in the cosmos. This relatedness to cosmic mysteries is the red thread running through the book.”

One can’t bend and twist pure thinking to one’s subjective will. Thinking itself thinks. The spiritual beings of the higher hierarchies enter free thinking and then your thinking receives its content from above.

Path of Anthroposophy
"Anyone interested in looking for them will find the basic principles of anthroposophy already enunciated in this book."

It takes no great effort of will to observe and then think about one's observations. It takes energy to engage in the activity of sense-free thinking.

People have to be shown how to get beyond merely poetical, artistic imagination to creative moral imagination.

The content of The Philosophy of Freedom is not contrived or the results of mystical superstition, but rather in the strictest sense the result of introspective observation verifiable by others.

You will find nothing at all in The Philosophy of Freedom that is derived from clairvoyant communications of spiritual science. It is written for the express purpose of disciplining thinking without any mention of theosophy.

In the first decade of the 20th century, August Ewerbeck got word that there were intimate circles in which Rudolf Steiner gave special esoteric training to those admitted to them. So he asked his teacher whether he too might be allowed to attend, and received the astonishing reply: “You don’t need to! You have understood my Philosophy of Freedom!”

"Those who had no desire to undertake the uncomfortable and demanding pursuit of clear thinking were little attracted to the direction taken by The Philosophy of Freedom."

"Too many seeking experience in all sorts of unclear paths, nebulous mystical approaches, attached themselves to what anthroposophy was trying to achieve in clarity. This group of people attracted the attention of a lot of ill-disposed persons who now attack what people with whom I have no connection whatsoever have been saying. But in these attacks they attribute to 'me' what these vague mystics have produced as their own twisted version of something intended to meet the urgent needs of our modern culture. What is needed is the brightest clarity in everything that has to do with thinking, not vague mysticism.”

The proper study of this book gives the reader an inner attitude that enables him to stand entirely on his own feet in relating to anthroposophy. It teaches him to present it on his own authority rather than on that of someone else.

Path of Freedom
When, in the bright circles of the spirit,
The soul calls forth
Pure energy of thinking,
It lays hold on knowledge of what freedom is.

When, entering fully in life,
Free, conscious man
Shapes reality from willing,
Then freedom is made living fact.

Steiner initially divides the problem of free will into freedom of thought and freedom of action. He argues that inner freedom is achieved when we bridge the gap between our perception, which reflects the outer appearance of the world, and our cognition, which give us access to the inner structure of the world. Outer freedom arises when we bridge the gap between our ideals and the constraints of external reality, letting our deeds be inspired by what he terms moral imagination. Steiner considers inner and outer freedom as integral to one another, and that true freedom is only achieved when they are united.

“My book addresses itself mainly to the question of how philosophy, as an art, deals with the subject of human freedom, what the nature of freedom really is, and whether we already possess it or can develop it.”

Path of Pure Thinking
What I called pure thinking in my Philosophy of Freedom was certainly not well named when judged by outer cultural conditions. For Eduard von Hartmann said to me:
“There is no such thing, one can only think with the aid of external observation.”
And all I could say in reply was:
“It has only to be tried and people will soon learn to be able to make it a reality.”

When is an action free? Only when it has its origin in pure thinking.

The Philosophy of Freedom is a path, a method leading to the actual experience of a thinking detached from the body-soul make-up.

Freedom dawns when we enable the will to become an ever mightier and mightier force in our thinking.

Out of pure thinking there can flow powerful impulses to moral action that are no longer determined by anything but pure spirit.

Rudolf Steiner declares, “The intention in my Philosophy of Freedom is that the reader must lay hold --with his own thinking activity-- page by page, that the book itself is only a sort of musical score, and that one must read this score through inner thinking activity in order to progress continually, out of his own resources, from thought to thought.  Who does not sense that he was in a manner been lifted above his ordinary way of thinking into a thinking free of the sense perceptible and that he moves altogether in this, so that he feels that he has become ‘free’ in his thinking from the limitations of the corporeal nature, ---such a person has not really read in the true sense of the word this Philosophy of Freedom.

Path of Study
Incomprehensible!…. Baffles the experts!….. You’ll never finish it!….. It’s a tangle of thought!…. These are Rudolf Steiner’s comments on the disappointing experience of readers when he first published The Philosophy of Freedom in 1894.

“Back in the 1890’s when the book was published, people hadn’t the least idea what to do with it. It was as though Europeans had been given a book in Chinese and couldn’t understand a thing it said.

Readers often stop reading the book soon after they begin it for the simple reason they would like to read it as they do any other book. Other popular books are read on a chaise lounge letting thought pictures pass in review before one’s mind.

In The Philosophy of Freedom readers have to keep shaking themselves to avoid being put to sleep by the thoughts they encounter. One has to try with all of one’s human strength to activate one’s inner being, to bring one’s whole thinking into motion.

The least honest are those who read The Philosophy of Freedom as they would any other book and then flatter themselves that they have really taken in the thoughts it contains. They’ve kept on reading strings of words without anything coming out of it that might be likened to the striking of steel on flint.”

Now what kind of reader approach did The Philosophy of Freedom count on? It had to assume a special way of reading. It expected the reader, as they read, to undergo the sort of inner experience that, in an external sense, is really like waking up out of sleep in the morning.

“The primary purpose of my book is to serve as thought training, training in the sense that the special way of both thinking and entertaining these thoughts is such as to bring the soul life of the reader into motion in somewhat the way that gymnastics exercise their limbs.”

The reading of the Philosophy of Freedom should not be a mere reading, it should be an experiencing with inner shocks, tensions and resolutions.

Path of Ethical Individualism
We hear calls for an improvement of public morality, but this overlooks the fact that moral action is a characteristic only of the free individual.

Actions motivated by instincts, reflexes, dispositions, maxims, commandments, social and religious customs and even laws are not truly moral.

A deed can only be described as moral in the truest sense when the individual has intuited the moral principle for the particular situation concerned and brought into play the imagination needed to realize that principle in the deed.

The idea and the love of the deed it engenders in the individual is all the motivation that is needed.

If this seems like a recipe for anarchy, then in a certain sense it is, that is in the sense that no external governance prevails, only the free individuality.

The free human being lives in confidence that he and any other free individual belong to one spiritual world, and that their intentions will harmonize.

What I have outlined here is what Rudolf Steiner called ethical individualism. Free moral action involves moral intuition, moral imagination, and moral technique.

Moral Intuition: The capacity to intuitively experience the particular moral principle for each single situation.

Moral Imagination: The ability of imagination to translate a general moral principle into a concrete mental picture of the action to be carried out.

Moral Technique: The ability to transform the world according to moral imaginations without violating the natural laws by which things are connected.

Path of Clairvoyance
When a man in the eighteenth century said, “Embolden yourself, O man, to make use of your powers of reason,” these were considered the words of a great enlightener.

Today a still greater challenge must ring out, that is, “Embolden yourself, O man, to recognize your concepts and ideas as the first stage of clairvoyance!”

The reader of The Philosophy of Freedom should be able to say to oneself: “Now I know, through this effort of my mind in thinking, what pure thinking really is.”

Then what I should like to call modern clairvoyance ceases to be anything miraculous.

That this clairvoyance should still appear as something particularly miraculous comes from people not wishing to develop the energy to bring activity into their thinking.

Path of Philosophy
The question of freedom cannot be settled by philosophical argument. Nor is it simply granted to us. If we want to be free, we must work through our own inner activity to overcome unconscious urges and habitual thinking.

Today’s materialism seeks to reduce us to totally unfree creatures completely determined by heredity and other influences. The experience of pure thinking is the only possible way of refuting materialism and is attainable by anyone with the “goodwill” to undertake this path.

Path of Anthroposophical Community
What appears as the common goal of a community is usually determined by the top down authority of a few leaders who are followed by the others.

The Philosophy of Freedom bases the independence of the human being upon the awakening of pure thinking as the origin of freedom and impulse to moral action.

How can we work together in freedom? Can pure thinking be applied to a group?

Taking life's ordinary concerns as a starting point, group discussion can rise to the level of pure conversation, or rather pure thinking as a group experience that results in group insight, real relationship between person and person, and a powerful impulse to joint activism.

Most of us are so habituated to what has always been done that we find it impossible to conceive of a leaderless society.

In a true anthroposophical community, the leader -- if there may be said to be one – are impulses to action arising out of pure conversation that is no longer determined by anything but pure spirit.

If we turn toward thinking in its essence, we find in it the power of love in the depths of its reality.

No leaders or external measures can bring about anthroposophical community building. It has to be called forth from the profoundest depths of each one’s consciousness.

"The trouble is The Philosophy of Freedom has not been read in the different way I have been describing. That is the point, and a point that must be sharply stressed if the development of the Anthroposophical Society is not to fall far behind anthroposophy itself. If it does fall behind, anthroposophy's conveyance through the society will result in its being completely misunderstood, and its only fruit will be endless conflict!"

“The members read it, but reading is not the same as understanding. They took what I offered, not as something issuing from my mouth or written in my books, but rather as what this one thought ‘mystical,’ that one ‘theosophical,’ another something else again”

“Anthroposophy is independent of anthroposophical societies and can be found independently of them. It can be found in a special way when one human being learns to wake up in the encounter with another and out of such awakening the forming of communities occurs.”

Path of Individual Initiative
Asked which of his books he would most want to see rescued if catastrophe should come upon the world, Rudolf Steiner replied without hesitation: "The Philosophy of Freedom."

Many ethical individualists today are applying their idealism in re-imagining our relationship to the environment and one another.

They are actively forming civil society organizations to forward: ecological sustainability, economic justice, human rights protection, political accountability and peace.

Using the tools of modern communication technology to organize –texting, cell phones, the internet—a bottom up rising of ethical individualists is taking place.

An awakened human spirit working collectively with others can change the world. The possibilities are extraordinary.

Path of New Social Order
“If the ideas contained in my Philosophy of Freedom are to be further developed and applied to external social life, so that these truths may become clear to a larger circle of people, it will be necessary to build a superstructure of the truths of spiritual science on the foundation of that philosophy.”

Building upon his Philosophy of Freedom Rudolf Steiner went on to write dozens of books and delivered over 6000 lectures on a variety of themes. This has inspired others to apply his innovative and holistic approaches in medicine, science, education, special education, philosophy, religion, economics, agriculture, architecture, the arts and other fields.

Waldorf Education
Biodynamic Farming
Anthroposophical Medicine
Camphill Movement and Curative Education
Social Threefolding
The Christian Community




To download The Path Of Rudolf Steiner audio right click on the file below and select "save link as.." and it should download.

Path of Rudolf Steiner.mp326.15 MB

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.


Greetings from Hamburg/ Germany!
We are working at the same thing!

Ruth Jäger

German anthro website translated

Here is the same German anthroposophy website in English using Google translator.

Cosmic Wisdom ~ Theosophy


erm, cough ... Philosophy of Freedom ....

'The true form of Christianity to-day is called Theosophy and it is a false Christianity which disavows Theosophy'

 On The Gospel of St. John

Rudolf Steiner

Berlin, June 26th, 1905




A good quote from Pink Floyd:

We don't need no education and we

don't need thought control

Hey teacher!

Leave those kids alone

You just another brick in the wall.


PS: if you may be confused - Besant and Leadbeater are not in the category of 'Theosophy' - in fact they actually belong to a B-sort of grade forum that supports their work.



no theosophy

You will find nothing at all in The Philosophy of Freedom that is derived from clairvoyant communications of spiritual science. It is written for the express purpose of disciplining thinking without any mention of theosophy. Rudolf Steiner

Steiner offered the world much more than theosophy. The Philosophy of Freedom is for  those who have no interest in theosophy and a gurus clairvoyant revelations. The "no theosophy" symbol just refers to no theosophy in POF. Many theosophists/anthroposophists, including translators of POF and the Russian Sergie with his book on POF filled with his usual intellectual speculations, are always trying to connect POF to theosophy, which is really an insult to Steiner's achievement.

Millions have rejected Steiner because they have no interest in theosophy, especially today as theosophists are on the fringe level of society along with the UFO'ers. The Philosophy of Freedom is for the modern thinker of today who demands to know rather than believe.

Tell it like it is

Hi Tom

Briefly, I noticed your new NO DOGS sign.

I thought that PoF was for everybody!

I hope to get back to the translation work soon. Will you be putting up a NO SLACKERS sign?

Keep your wits keen, Tom.


POF for the rest of us

The Philosophy of Freedom is Steiner's book for the 7 billion people on the planet who have no interest in theosophy or his clairvoyant readings. I am trying to change the misconception that Steiner=theosophy, mystic, etc. As almost no one is interested in theosophy or mysticism in the 21st century, it is very important that this misconception is cleared up.

I am starting to work on the translation, getting used to working part time on it.

Earth & The Starry Heavens

I think you are doing great.  And don't mind me popping in from time to time.



I think the most important

I think the most important is the connection of Philosophy of Freedom with real life, how we experience our moral intuitions day by day amongst other, sometimes very different, people and situations. It is a learning process with many questions. It would be great if we shared our thoughts and experiences.

What do you think?

What is real life

Greetings Olga
Isn't the world of ideas the most real world in the context of antroposophy? I suppose when we talk about real life physical world takes the firs place and spirit has to wait until we finish our physical pursuits. And at the end of long day we can finally read a few pages of "Philosophy of Freedom".

I agree that the world of

I agree that the world of ideas may be the most real part of theosophy/anthroposophy, but Monism, as described in the Philosophy of Freedom:

7-9 [27] Let us call the view which we have characterized above, into which metaphysical realism merges when it discards its contradictory elements, monism, because it combines one-sided realism with idealism into a higher unity.
A one-sided Idealism, of which I am well familar, results in:
2-4 Idealists are driven to remain fixed with their world view within the activity of the “I”, as if spellbound.

But you are probably referring to the transitory nature of real things:

7-7 [20] Naive realism, with its fundamental principle of the reality of all perceived things, is contradicted by experience, which teaches us that the content of percepts is of a transitory nature. The tulip I see is real today; in a year it will have vanished into nothingness. What persists is the species tulip. For the naïve realist, however, this species is "only" an idea, not a reality. Thus this theory of the world find itself in the position of seeing its realities arise and perish, while what it regards as unreal, in contrast with the real, persists. Hence naïve realism is compelled to acknowledge, in addition to percepts, the existence of something ideal.

The real life for me is

The real life for me is based on the interaction (or unity) of two processes:

first - how I percept my “inner world” (thoughts and feelings), which are influenced by the “outside world” and  second - how I percept the “outside world” which is not me, but also influenced by me (I have my space and time in this world). Both parts of my perceptions lead me to the action in “the both sides”: active inner work (based of course on the thinking) e.i. making decisions, act of forgiveness, looking for solutions, for ideas and ideals etc., and what and how I’m doing (acting) in the “external world” bringing to it my ideals.

In this “outside world” I meet people and face up different life situations.

So, talking about real life mentioned above, I meant a process of how our ideals work out in a so called external world.

7.10 [30] As soon as the I, which is separated from the world in the act of perceiving, fits itself back into the world continuum through thoughtful contemplation, all further questioning ceases, having been but a consequence of the separation.

everything is real

Considering the last quotation, there is no need to add "real" to "world", just because there is only one world, always real, but there is certainly a great need of proper adjective when we want to point at some extremely interesting part of reality, like spiritual word. Steiner emphasized that human has to perceive himself as a spirit, from this point of view the very first part of so called external world is our own physical body, and the first process of how an idea express itself is how do we, as a spirits, move, feed, dress our bodies (haircut including), here is the great domain where we can be a success or fail.

OK, but the question is:

OK, but the question is: what are we thinking and doing as individuals in the specific life's situations?

10.9 Monism (…) sees in man a developing being, and asks whether, in the course of this development, the stage of the free spirit can be reached.

10.11 Monism is quite clear that a being acting under physical or moral compulsion cannot be a truly moral being. It regards the phases of automatic behavior (following natural urges and instincts) and of obedient behavior (following moral standards) as necessary preparatory stages of morality, but it also sees that both these transitory stages can be overcome by the free spirit.  (…)

10.12  (…) Human morality, like human knowledge, is conditioned by human nature.(…)
Morality is for the monist a specifically human quality, and spiritual freedom the human way of being moral.

Is there any sense of sharing moral intuition

Even if someone has experienced a moral intuition and than tell us about it we can only believe the man really experienced it. There is no way we can check what we have heard is true, there is no external difference between action motivated by moral intuition or something else. We can share thoughts but how can we verify if the very thought was a source of action, it is always possible a person who thinks so is under delusion. Besides, if a man is able to experience a moral intuition, he doesn't need to hear about someone's intuition, he always has his own. A moral intuition can be used just once, that is the sense of moral individualism, after that the thought is dead, sharing it has no value for someone who wants to be a free spirit by himself.

there is no external

there is no external difference between action motivated by moral intuition or something else.

A moral intuition can be used just once, that is the sense of moral individualism, after that the thought is dead, sharing it has no value for someone who wants to be a free spirit by himself.

These are problems I have struggled with when it comes to discussion. The Philosophy of Freedom seems to approach this by discussing the process rather than the results of moral individualism. The process is a real thing that can be examined from various sides and kinds of experience. For example Chapter 9 describes various experiences of intuitive activity.


I think that the theory of knowledge can only be held in a mind that has formed itself out of the theory of knowledge. Such a mind hears its own utterences, recognises itself, and moves on. As regards sharing, a mind as self-creating as POF describes, knows precisely with whom it is engaging ("karma") and recognises this in the sensation of its specific utterence.Confirmation doesn't come in to it. Also, I think the aforementioned sensation of a true utterence is an experience of what Anthroposophists call "Christ". To experience this latter mood one has to have been, to some extent, assimilated-assimilated as opposed to self-willed- self-will being the usual way of sharing daily utterences.


love to all.


Discover Self

10.10 ...Nature does not send man forth from her arms ready made as a free spirit, but ... she leads him up to a certain stage, from which he continues to develop still as an unfree being, until he comes to the point where he finds his own self.

inability to identify human development

Most people look at stereotypes to identify human development. It could be warm smiling people like the Dali Lama, successful people in the world like Warren Buffet, or even Jesus. But if human development is to discover your own Self, each person would likely be unique and not conform to our expectations in morality or character.

The development itself is

The development itself is a process of the turning this inability into an ability; then, instead of stereotypes, we can see the teachers amongst of humanity. Actually we can learn from everyone all the time. As Steiner also mentioned, we can learn a lot from children.

Free Deed

Thanks for the opportunity to download. There are a lot of videos in the Internet about Rudolf Steiner's works but nearly all of them are not in English. Thanks for an English version. As for me, I liked this part most of all http://www.tubestime.com/watch/rudolf-steiner-what-is-a-free-deed . It is a great manner of presentation but I still think that it is better to read his whole book and to make your own conclusions.