Chapter 2 Section 0

Submitted by Tom Last on Sun, 03/11/2007 - 11:30pm.

The Fundamental Desire For Knowledge

" target="_blank">Audio

Two souls reside, alas, within my breast,
And each one from the other would be parted.
The one holds fast, in sturdy lust for love,
With clutching organs clinging to the world;
The other strongly rises from the gloom
To lofty fields of ancient heritage.
Faust I, Scene 2, lines 1112-1117.

2-0) MOOD OF TRANSCENDENTALISM (Mercury)
[1] In these words Goethe expresses a characteristic feature which is deeply rooted in human nature. Man is not organized as a self-consistent unity. He always demands more than the world, of its own accord, gives him. Nature has endowed us with needs; among them are some that she leaves to our own activity to satisfy. Abundant as are the gifts she has bestowed upon us, still more abundant are our desires. We seem born to be dissatisfied. And our thirst for knowledge is but a special instance of this dissatisfaction. We look twice at a tree. The first time we see its branches at rest, the second time in motion. We are not satisfied with this observation. Why, we ask, does the tree appear to us now at rest, now in motion? Every glance at Nature evokes in us a multitude of questions. Every phenomenon we meet sets us a new problem. Every experience is a riddle. We see that from the egg there emerges a creature like the mother animal, and we ask the reason for the likeness. We observe a living being grow and develop to a certain degree of perfection, and we seek the underlying conditions for this experience. Nowhere are we satisfied with what Nature spreads out before our senses. Everywhere we seek what we call the explanation of the facts.

[2] The something more which we seek in things, over and above what is immediately given to us in them, splits our whole being into two parts. We become conscious of our antithesis to the world. We confront the world as independent beings. The universe appears to us in two opposite parts: I and World.

[3] We erect this barrier between ourselves and the world as soon as consciousness first dawns in us. But we never cease to feel that, in spite of all, we belong to the world, that there is a connecting link between it and us, and that we are beings within, and not without, the universe.

[4] This feeling makes us strive to bridge over this antithesis, and in this bridging lies ultimately the whole spiritual striving of mankind. The history of our spiritual life is a continuing search for the unity between ourselves and the world. Religion, art and science follow, one and all, this aim. The religious believer seeks in the revelation which God grants him the solution to the universal riddle which his I, dissatisfied with the world of mere appearance, sets before him. The artist seeks to embody in his material the ideas that are in his I, in order to reconcile what lives in him with the world outside. He too feels dissatisfied with the world of mere appearance and seeks to mold into it that something more which his I, transcending it, contains. The thinker seeks the laws of phenomena, and strives to penetrate by thinking what he experiences by observing. Only when we have made the world-content into our thought-content do we again find the unity out of which we had separated ourselves. We shall see later that this goal can be reached only if the task of the research scientist is conceived at a much deeper level than is often the case.

The whole situation I have described here presents itself to us on the stage of history in the conflict between the one-world theory, or monism, and the two-world theory, or dualism. Dualism pays attention only to the separation between I and World which the consciousness of man has brought about. All its efforts consist in a vain struggle to reconcile these opposites, which it calls now spirit (mind) and matter, now subject and object, now thinking and appearance. It feels that there must be a bridge between the two worlds but is not in a position to find it. In that man is aware of himself as "I", he cannot but think of this "I" as being on the side of the spirit; and in contrasting this "I" with the world, he is bound to put on the world's side the realm of percepts given to the senses, that is, the world of matter. In doing so, man puts himself right into the middle of this antithesis of spirit and matter. He is the more compelled to do so because his own body belongs to the material world. Thus the "I", or Ego, belongs to the realm of spirit as a part of it; the material objects and events which are perceived by the senses belong to the "World". All the riddles which relate to spirit and matter, man must inevitably rediscover in the fundamental riddle of his own nature. Monism pays attention only to the unity and tries either to deny or to slur over the opposites, present though they are. Neither of these two points of view can satisfy us, for they do not do justice to the facts. Dualism sees in spirit (I) and matter (World) two fundamentally different entities, and cannot, therefore, understand how they can interact with one another. How should spirit be aware of what goes on in matter, seeing that the essential nature of matter is quite alien to spirit? Or how in these circumstances should spirit act upon matter, so as to translate its intentions into actions? The most ingenious and the most absurd hypotheses have been propounded to answer these questions. Up to the present, however, monism is not in a much better position. It has tried three different ways of meeting the difficulty. Either it denies spirit and becomes materialism or it denies matter in order to seek its salvation in spiritualism; or it asserts that even in the simplest entities in the world, spirit and matter are indissolubly bound together so that there is no need to marvel at the appearance in man of these two modes of existence, seeing that they are never found apart.

 

Topic: I - World Separation
  1. We seem born to be dissatisfied. And our thirst for knowledge is but a special instance of this dissatisfaction.
    • Every glance at Nature evokes in us a multitude of questions.
    • Nowhere are we satisfied with what Nature spreads out before our senses.
    • Everywhere we seek what we call the explanation of the facts.

  2. We seek something more in things that exceeds what is immediately given. The fact that this something more exceeds what is directly given us splits our whole being into two parts.
    • We become conscious of our standing in opposition to the world, as independent beings.
    • The universe appears to us as two opposite parts: I and World.
    • But we never loose the feeling that we belong to the world, that there is a connecting link between it and us.

  3. The history of our spiritual life is a continuing search for the unity between ourselves and the world.
    • The religious believer seeks in the revelation which God grants him the solution.
    • The artist seeks to embody in his material the ideas that are in his I.
    • The thinker seeks the laws of phenomena.
    • Only when we have made the world-content into our thought-content do we again find the unity.

  4. The whole situation described presents itself to us on the stage of history in the conflict between the one-world theory, or monism, and the two-world theory, or dualism.
    • Dualism pays attention to the separation between I and World which the consciousness has brought about.
      1. All its efforts consist in a vain struggle to reconcile these opposites.
      2. The "I", or Ego, belongs to the realm of spirit.
      3. The material objects and events which are perceived by the senses belong to the "World".
    • Monism pays attention only to the unity and tries either to deny or to slur over the opposites.
      1. It denies spirit and becomes materialism.
      2. It denies matter in order to seek its salvation in spiritualism.
      3. Or it asserts that spirit and matter are indissolubly bound together.
Question:

Match-up Quiz A
Match-up Quiz B
Match-up Quiz C

Practical Training In Thought
Thinking Exercise #2

Right Thinking Exercise 2A (Re-think in mental pictures)
Right Thinking Exercise 2B (Think in thought pictures - future and past)

SPIRIT, MIND
translation note
From Michael Wilson's Introduction to The Philosophy of Freedom
Perhaps because we use the concept of mind to include all our experiences through thinking, the concepts of spirit and soul have practically dropped out of everyday use, whereas in German there is no distinct equivalent for “mind”.....For Steiner, the spirit is experienced directly in the act of intuitive thinking. The human spirit is that part of us that thinks, but the spiritual world is not limited to the personal field of the individual human being; it opens out to embrace the eternal truths of existence. The English word “spirit” gives the sense of something more universal, less personal, than “mind”, and since Steiner's philosophical path leads to an experience of the reality of the spiritual world, I have kept the word spirit wherever possible, using “mind” or “mental” in a few places where it seemed more appropriate. The “spiritual activity” here meant is thus more than mental activity, although it starts at a level we would call mental; it leads the human being, aware of himself as a spirit, into the ultimate experience of truth.

AttachmentSize
2-0.mp32.8 MB